[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkda2H_Ls7FT-GPkM2HLci0rLomwcP+Y5e7CJgXtT2NxJqA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 19:49:01 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@...ux.ibm.com>,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/mm: Make virt_to_pfn() a static inline
On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 3:44 PM Alexander Gordeev
<agordeev@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> Funnily enough, except drivers/s390/char/vmcp.c none of affected
> code pieces below is an offender. But anyway, to me it looks like
> a nice improvement.
I'm puzzled, vmcp.c is a char * so actually not an offender
(I am trying to push a version without casting to the compile farm),
the rest are unsigned long passed to the function which now
(after my change) has const void * as argument?
Example:
> > @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ static long cmm_alloc_pages(long nr, long *counter,
unsigned long addr;
> > + diag10_range(virt_to_pfn((void *)addr), 1);
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists