[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230811154523.61e67cc3@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 15:45:23 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Chuang Wang <nashuiliang@...il.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tracing/eprobe: Iterate trace_eprobe directly
On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 16:12:39 +0800
Chuang Wang <nashuiliang@...il.com> wrote:
> +
> +#define for_each_trace_eprobe_on_trace_probe(ep, _tp) \
> + list_for_each_entry(ep, trace_probe_probe_list(_tp), tp.list)
> +
As I replied to the other patch, but after this one was sent (sorry, I was
hyperfocused on my work the last couple of days and was not reading email,
so my INBOX is a bit full). I really hate the verbosity of that name.
At a minimum, let's call it:
for_each_trace_point_eprobe()
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists