[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <25deb65e-a8f3-957b-9e4f-759604111d50@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 08:21:33 +0200
From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] bitmap: replace _reg_op(REG_OP_ALLOC) with
bitmap_set()
On 11/08/2023 02.57, Yury Norov wrote:
> _reg_op(REG_OP_ALLOC) duplicates bitmap_set(). Fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
> ---
> lib/bitmap.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/bitmap.c b/lib/bitmap.c
> index 3a589016f5e0..c9afe704fe4b 100644
> --- a/lib/bitmap.c
> +++ b/lib/bitmap.c
> @@ -1352,9 +1352,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(bitmap_release_region);
> */
> int bitmap_allocate_region(unsigned long *bitmap, unsigned int pos, int order)
> {
> + unsigned int nbits = pos + BIT(order);
> +
That really doesn't sound right. Have you added self-tests for these
functions first and then used those to catch regressions?
Rasmus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists