linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/127] 6.1.45-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2023081144-occultist-cytoplast-d7b5@gregkh>
Date:   Fri, 11 Aug 2023 12:07:09 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/127] 6.1.45-rc1 review

On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 09:14:43AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 12:39:47PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.45 release.
> > There are 127 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Aug 2023 10:36:10 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> 
> Build results:
> 	total: 157 pass: 153 fail: 4
> Failed builds:
> 	loongarch:defconfig
> 	loongarch:allnoconfig
> 	loongarch:tinyconfig
> 	loongarch:allmodconfig
> Qemu test results:
> 	total: 521 pass: 513 fail: 8
> Failed tests:
> 	arm:fuji-bmc:aspeed_g5_defconfig:notests:mem1G:mtd128,0,8,1:net,nic:aspeed-bmc-facebook-fuji:rootfs
> 	arm:bletchley-bmc,fmc-model=mt25qu02g,spi-model=mt25qu02g:aspeed_g5_defconfig:notests:mem1G:mtd256:net,nic:aspeed-bmc-facebook-bletchley:rootfs
> 	<all loongarch>
> 
> loongarch failures as already reported, introduced with v6.1.44.
> 
> The failed arm tests crash in f2fs (again - previously reported
> against the v6.1.43 release candidate).
> 
> [    6.685458] 8<--- cut here ---
> [    6.685593] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000034
> [    6.685725] [00000034] *pgd=00000000
> [    6.686010] Internal error: Oops: 5 [#1] SMP ARM
> [    6.686209] CPU: 0 PID: 194 Comm: seedrng Not tainted 6.1.45-rc1-00128-g02a4c6c322d1 #1
> [    6.686350] Hardware name: Generic DT based system
> [    6.686467] PC is at f2fs_issue_flush+0x160/0x210
> [    6.686821] LR is at f2fs_do_sync_file+0x7c8/0xaa8

Odd that you are the only one seeing this f2fs report, does no one else
use f2fs on 6.1 systems?

thanks,

greg k-h