linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/127] 6.1.45-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 11 Aug 2023 03:26:06 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/127] 6.1.45-rc1 review

On 8/11/23 03:07, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 09:14:43AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 12:39:47PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.45 release.
>>> There are 127 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Aug 2023 10:36:10 +0000.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>
>> Build results:
>> 	total: 157 pass: 153 fail: 4
>> Failed builds:
>> 	loongarch:defconfig
>> 	loongarch:allnoconfig
>> 	loongarch:tinyconfig
>> 	loongarch:allmodconfig
>> Qemu test results:
>> 	total: 521 pass: 513 fail: 8
>> Failed tests:
>> 	arm:fuji-bmc:aspeed_g5_defconfig:notests:mem1G:mtd128,0,8,1:net,nic:aspeed-bmc-facebook-fuji:rootfs
>> 	arm:bletchley-bmc,fmc-model=mt25qu02g,spi-model=mt25qu02g:aspeed_g5_defconfig:notests:mem1G:mtd256:net,nic:aspeed-bmc-facebook-bletchley:rootfs
>> 	<all loongarch>
>>
>> loongarch failures as already reported, introduced with v6.1.44.
>>
>> The failed arm tests crash in f2fs (again - previously reported
>> against the v6.1.43 release candidate).
>>
>> [    6.685458] 8<--- cut here ---
>> [    6.685593] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000034
>> [    6.685725] [00000034] *pgd=00000000
>> [    6.686010] Internal error: Oops: 5 [#1] SMP ARM
>> [    6.686209] CPU: 0 PID: 194 Comm: seedrng Not tainted 6.1.45-rc1-00128-g02a4c6c322d1 #1
>> [    6.686350] Hardware name: Generic DT based system
>> [    6.686467] PC is at f2fs_issue_flush+0x160/0x210
>> [    6.686821] LR is at f2fs_do_sync_file+0x7c8/0xaa8
> 
> Odd that you are the only one seeing this f2fs report, does no one else
> use f2fs on 6.1 systems?
> 

It would appear that none of the CI systems does.

Guenter