[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230811121754.3a4dc270@donnerap.manchester.arm.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 12:17:54 +0100
From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
To: Martin Botka <martin.botka@...ainline.org>
Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alan Ma <tech@...u3d.com>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] nvmem: sunxi_sid: Add support for H616 SID
On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 13:02:35 +0200
Martin Botka <martin.botka@...ainline.org> wrote:
Hi Martin,
> Add support for the H616 SID controller.
thanks for upstreaming this!
>
> The config can be reused from A64.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Botka <martin.botka@...ainline.org>
> ---
> drivers/nvmem/sunxi_sid.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/sunxi_sid.c b/drivers/nvmem/sunxi_sid.c
> index a970f1741cc6..df6fb5e0b724 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/sunxi_sid.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/sunxi_sid.c
> @@ -216,6 +216,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id sunxi_sid_of_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64-sid", .data = &sun50i_a64_cfg },
> { .compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h5-sid", .data = &sun50i_a64_cfg },
> { .compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h6-sid", .data = &sun50i_h6_cfg },
> + { .compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h616-sid", .data = &sun50i_a64_cfg },
You don't need a new compatible string, then.
Just use
compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h616-sid", "allwinner,sun50i-a64-sid";
in the DT, and add that combo to the binding, then you don't need any
driver patches at all - with the added benefit of that already working
with existing kernels.
Though I wonder if that has really only 256 bytes of fuses? Do we have any
evidence of that?
Cheers,
Andre
> {/* sentinel */},
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sunxi_sid_of_match);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists