[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZNZHfPCMg1Js28iF@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 17:36:44 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Yann Sionneau <yann@...nneau.net>
Cc: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Yann Sionneau <ysionneau@...ray.eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: designware: add support for pinctrl for recovery
On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 03:52:01PM +0200, Yann Sionneau wrote:
> From: Yann Sionneau <ysionneau@...ray.eu>
>
> Currently if the SoC needs pinctrl to switch the scl and sda
SCL
SDA
> from hw function to gpio function, the recovery won't work.
from the I2C
GPIO
> scl-gpio = <>;
> sda-gpio = <>;
>
> Are not enough for some SoCs to have a working recovery.
> Some need:
>
> scl-gpio = <>;
> sda-gpio = <>;
> pinctrl-names = "default", "recovery";
> pinctrl-0 = <&i2c_pins_hw>;
> pinctrl-1 = <&i2c_pins_gpio>;
>
> The driver was not filling rinfo->pinctrl with the device node
> pinctrl data which is needed by generic recovery code.
...
> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> #include <linux/regmap.h>
> #include <linux/reset.h>
> +#include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h>
Keep this in order.
...
> + rinfo->pinctrl = devm_pinctrl_get(dev->dev);
> + if (!rinfo->pinctrl || IS_ERR(rinfo->pinctrl)) {
It's not possible to have it NULL, why a dead code?
> + rinfo->pinctrl = NULL;
> + dev_info(dev->dev, "can't get pinctrl, bus recovery might not work\n");
> + }
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists