[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOX2RU6nMvpTkGdwBoLJrES5v0qARnDDT6nCVd-DZid7p3pg6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2023 11:55:55 +0200
From: Robert Marko <robimarko@...il.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Cc: agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: qcom: ipq4019-ap.dk01.1: align flash node
with bindings
On Sat, 12 Aug 2023 at 00:56, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 11.08.2023 23:35, Robert Marko wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 at 23:28, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 11.08.2023 23:01, Robert Marko wrote:
> >>> Rename the SPI-NOR node to flash@0, remove #address-cells and #size-cells
> >>> as they should be under the partitions subnode and use the generic
> >>> jedec,spi-nor compatible.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@...il.com>
> >>> ---
> >> You can also do "nandmanufacturer,mx25l25635e", "jedec,spi-nor"
> >
> > Hi,
> > I grepped the vendor U-Boot to make sure it's not being triggered off
> > the mx25l25635e
> > compatible but the only hit is the IC support itself.
> > MX25L25635 was just the original NOR IC Qualcomm used on the board so
> > to me it made
> > most sense to just use the JEDEC compatible as NOR itself is JEDEC NOR
> > compatible.
> OK if dynamic identification works fine
It should work fine, datasheet is clear that its JEDEC compatible.
That being said, I dont actually have the board, just figured it was
time for a cleanup as
OpenWrt has been patching DK01 and DK04 for ages.
Regards,
Robert
>
> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
>
> Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists