[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZNoxGXcK9QOfAfbW@nam-dell>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 15:50:17 +0200
From: Nam Cao <namcaov@...il.com>
To: Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: test code for kprobe
On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 02:28:11PM +0200, Björn Töpel wrote:
> Nam Cao <namcaov@...il.com> writes:
>
> A RISC-V specific kprobes test -- much welcome!
>
> Please add a proper commit message here.
>
> > ---
> > drivers/test_kprobe/Makefile | 3 +
> > drivers/test_kprobe/test_kprobe.c | 265 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 268 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/test_kprobe/Makefile
> > create mode 100644 drivers/test_kprobe/test_kprobe.c
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/test_kprobe/Makefile b/drivers/test_kprobe/Makefile
>
> Architecture specific test code usually reside in "arch/$ARCH"
> (arch/riscv), and is part of Kconfig.debug.
>
> Have a look at:
> * grep for ARM_KPROBES_TEST in arch/arm
> * grep for KPROBES_SANITY_TEST, and in arch/powerpc grep
> test_emulate_step
> * grep S390_KPROBES_SANITY_TEST
Sorry that I wasn't clear with this: I just wanted to show how testing was done.
This is not meant to be merged.
I do have plans to clean this up and send upstream in the future, but not with
this patch series.
Best regards,
Nam
Powered by blists - more mailing lists