linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] spi: tegra114: Remove unnecessary NULL-pointer checks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 15 Aug 2023 23:26:10 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
        Alexander Danilenko <al.b.danilenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Mason Zhang <Mason.Zhang@...iatek.com>,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lvc-project@...uxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: tegra114: Remove unnecessary NULL-pointer checks

On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 12:20:58 +0300, Alexander Danilenko wrote:
> cs_setup, cs_hold and cs_inactive points to fields of spi_device struct,
> so there is no sense in checking them for NULL.
> 
> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: tegra114: Remove unnecessary NULL-pointer checks
      commit: 373c36bf7914e3198ac2654dede499f340c52950

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark