[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230816160850.48fa95b6@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 16:08:50 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: Chuang Wang <nashuiliang@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tracing/eprobe: Iterate trace_eprobe directly
On Sat, 12 Aug 2023 14:20:19 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
> > At a minimum, let's call it:
> >
> > for_each_trace_point_eprobe()
>
> OK, what about "for_each_trace_eprobe_on()"? I would like to clarify
>
> - what type is returned
> - not all trace_eprobes, but only on the trace_probe.
>
> Thank you,
for_each_trace_eprobe_tp() or for_each_trace_tp_eprobe() ?
As it only works for a trace_probe.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists