lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230816160850.48fa95b6@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Wed, 16 Aug 2023 16:08:50 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc:     Chuang Wang <nashuiliang@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tracing/eprobe: Iterate trace_eprobe directly

On Sat, 12 Aug 2023 14:20:19 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:

> > At a minimum, let's call it:
> > 
> >   for_each_trace_point_eprobe()  
> 
> OK, what about "for_each_trace_eprobe_on()"? I would like to clarify
> 
> - what type is returned
> - not all trace_eprobes, but only on the trace_probe.
> 
> Thank you,

 for_each_trace_eprobe_tp() or for_each_trace_tp_eprobe() ?

As it only works for a trace_probe.

-- Steve

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ