[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fd7b559d-4a3a-4938-937b-bfcd5a7b315b@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 15:36:46 -0700
From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Iain Lane <iain@...ngesquash.org.uk>,
Shyam-sundar S-k <Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 1/9] ACPI: Add comments to clarify some #ifdef
statements
On 8/16/2023 1:41 PM, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> With nested #ifdef statements it's sometimes difficult to tell
> which code goes with which statement. One comment was wrong,
> so fix it and add another comment to clarify another.
I would explain what is wrong clearly in the commit log. I see this file has
many #ifdefs without comments. Do you want to fix them all?
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
> ---
> v9->v10:
> * no changes
> ---
> include/linux/acpi.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> index 641dc48439873..0d5277b7c6323 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> @@ -1117,10 +1117,10 @@ static inline void arch_reserve_mem_area(acpi_physical_address addr,
> size_t size)
> {
> }
> -#endif /* CONFIG_X86 */
> +#endif /* CONFIG_IA64 */
> #else
> #define acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep(func, pm1a_ctrl, pm1b_ctrl) do { } while (0)
> -#endif
> +#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_ACPI) && defined(CONFIG_PM)
> int acpi_dev_suspend(struct device *dev, bool wakeup);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists