linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Add support for more XMC series

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 17 Aug 2023 19:10:21 +0200
From:   Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
To:     SSunk <ssunkkan@...il.com>
Cc:     miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, pratyush@...nel.org, richard@....at,
        ssunkkan@...il.com, tudor.ambarus@...aro.org, vigneshr@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add support for more XMC series

Hi,

>> XMC parts seem to have SFDP tables and they should work out of the box
>> without any patches with the generic spi nor driver [1]. Therefore,
>> you don't need any entry at all.
> 
> I think it is related to the PARSE_SFDP flag.
> The XMC flash part supports SFDP, so i don’t needto add
> NO_SFDP_FLAGS() macro.

Correct. If the flash is working with PARSE_SFDP, it has SFDP and
all the information of the flash_info table is pulled from the SFDP
tables, except for the part name. Therefore, you don't need any entry
at all. The flash should just work out of the box. Are you using the
latest kernel?

-michael