linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Add support for more XMC series

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 18 Aug 2023 01:17:06 +0800
From:   Clus Tom <ssunkkan@...il.com>
To:     Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
Cc:     miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, pratyush@...nel.org, richard@....at,
        tudor.ambarus@...aro.org, vigneshr@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add support for more XMC series


Yes, I'm using the latest kernel.


> 在 2023年8月18日，01:10，Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc> 写道：
> 
> Hi,
> 
>>> XMC parts seem to have SFDP tables and they should work out of the box
>>> without any patches with the generic spi nor driver [1]. Therefore,
>>> you don't need any entry at all.
>> I think it is related to the PARSE_SFDP flag.
>> The XMC flash part supports SFDP, so i don’t needto add
>> NO_SFDP_FLAGS() macro.
> 
> Correct. If the flash is working with PARSE_SFDP, it has SFDP and
> all the information of the flash_info table is pulled from the SFDP
> tables, except for the part name. Therefore, you don't need any entry
> at all. The flash should just work out of the box. Are you using the
> latest kernel?
> 
> -michael