[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <169226613323.81413.1101515821069495424.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 15:25:33 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...labora.com>
Cc: chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com, kishon@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
matthias.bgg@...il.com, angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com,
sam.shih@...iatek.com, jieyy.yang@...iatek.com,
frank-w@...lic-files.de, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chris.obbard@...labora.com,
kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: mediatek,tphy: allow
simple nodename pattern
On Mon, 14 Aug 2023 12:39:30 +0300, Eugen Hristev wrote:
> The pattern for the nodename only allows t-phy@... , however, for the case
> when the t-phy has no `reg` and only `ranges` (basically when the t-phy
> is just a parent node), dtc will throw this warning:
>
> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /t-phy@...43000: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property
>
> For a node like this:
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/2] dt-bindings: phy: mediatek,tphy: allow simple nodename pattern
commit: e4077ca4ebdefa1b4616e4dafcb67b621253b233
Best regards,
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists