linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: qcom-pmic-gpio: silence -EPROBE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a3431eaf-053a-4e1c-b082-e87a3aaefbf3@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 17 Aug 2023 17:01:19 +0200
From:   Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To:     Brian Masney <bmasney@...hat.com>, andersson@...nel.org,
        linus.walleij@...aro.org
Cc:     agross@...nel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: qcom-pmic-gpio: silence -EPROBE_DEFER message on
 probe

On 17.08.2023 16:59, Brian Masney wrote:
> The following message shows up one or more times when booting a Qualcomm
> SA8775 Development board:
> 
>     qcom-spmi-gpio c440000.spmi:pmic@2:gpio@...0: can't add gpio chip
> 
> Convert this over to use dev_err_probe() to silence this message.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <bmasney@...hat.com>
> ---
That looks odd, why would it ever defer?

SPMI should be up by the time it gets a chance to probe.

Konrad