[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230817161718.GA4121@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 18:17:18 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>,
David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
Petr Skocik <pskocik@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Mike Christie <michael.christie@...cle.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"haifeng.xu" <haifeng.xu@...pee.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] signal: Add KUnit tests
On 08/16, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> Arguably we can skip this as well. There are only 3 uses of
> do_each_thread (pivot_root, SAK, and ia64 backtrace) and they all should
> be changed to be for_each_process_thread.
Hmm. I thought that do_each_thread() was already killed ...
Let me send the trivial patch.
We also need to kill (or rework) while_each_thread() and next_thread(),
I'll try to do this tomorrow.
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists