linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] iov_iter: Don't deal with iter->copy_mc in memcpy_from_iter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2093413.1692377320@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:   Fri, 18 Aug 2023 17:48:40 +0100
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@...t.de>,
        Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
        "Matthew Wilcox" <willy@...radead.org>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
        "linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] iov_iter: Don't deal with iter->copy_mc in memcpy_from_iter_mc()

David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM> wrote:

> > iov_iter_init                            inc 0x27 -> 0x31 +0xa
> 
> Are you hitting the gcc bug that loads the constant from memory?

I'm not sure what that looks like.  For your perusal, here's a disassembly of
the use-switch-on-enum variant:

   0xffffffff8177726c <+0>:     cmp    $0x1,%esi
   0xffffffff8177726f <+3>:     jbe    0xffffffff81777273 <iov_iter_init+7>
   0xffffffff81777271 <+5>:     ud2
   0xffffffff81777273 <+7>:     test   %esi,%esi
   0xffffffff81777275 <+9>:     movw   $0x1,(%rdi)
   0xffffffff8177727a <+14>:    setne  0x3(%rdi)
   0xffffffff8177727e <+18>:    xor    %eax,%eax
   0xffffffff81777280 <+20>:    movb   $0x0,0x2(%rdi)
   0xffffffff81777284 <+24>:    movb   $0x1,0x4(%rdi)
   0xffffffff81777288 <+28>:    mov    %rax,0x8(%rdi)
   0xffffffff8177728c <+32>:    mov    %rdx,0x10(%rdi)
   0xffffffff81777290 <+36>:    mov    %r8,0x18(%rdi)
   0xffffffff81777294 <+40>:    mov    %rcx,0x20(%rdi)
   0xffffffff81777298 <+44>:    jmp    0xffffffff81d728a0 <__x86_return_thunk>

versus the use-bitmap variant:

   0xffffffff81777311 <+0>:     cmp    $0x1,%esi
   0xffffffff81777314 <+3>:     jbe    0xffffffff81777318 <iov_iter_init+7>
   0xffffffff81777316 <+5>:     ud2
   0xffffffff81777318 <+7>:     test   %esi,%esi
   0xffffffff8177731a <+9>:     movb   $0x2,(%rdi)
   0xffffffff8177731d <+12>:    setne  0x1(%rdi)
   0xffffffff81777321 <+16>:    xor    %eax,%eax
   0xffffffff81777323 <+18>:    mov    %rdx,0x10(%rdi)
   0xffffffff81777327 <+22>:    mov    %rax,0x8(%rdi)
   0xffffffff8177732b <+26>:    mov    %r8,0x18(%rdi)
   0xffffffff8177732f <+30>:    mov    %rcx,0x20(%rdi)
   0xffffffff81777333 <+34>:    jmp    0xffffffff81d72960 <__x86_return_thunk>

It seems to be that the former is loading byte constants individually, whereas
Linus combined all those fields into a single byte and eliminated one of them.

David