lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZN8w+WVxexzMZXj7@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date:   Fri, 18 Aug 2023 16:51:05 +0800
From:   Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
Cc:     Lucas Segarra Fernandez <lucas.segarra.fernandez@...el.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
        qat-linux@...el.com, alx.manpages@...il.com,
        Giovanni Cabiddu <giovanni.cabiddu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] crypto: qat - add pm_status debugfs file

On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 11:46:55AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> Splitting ARRAY_SIZE() is very beneficial on its own.
> The static assert is slightly more robust for the big code then defining
> something that at some point can be missed or miscalculated. Yet we can
> survive with a macro if you thinks it's better.

Yes please go ahead with just a macro.

If the ARRYA_SIZE thing turns out to be useful for other people I'm
sure it'll be added.  But I don't see much value in this particular
use.

Thanks,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ