[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230818-parkplatz-wahrzeichen-bff62b8dc55e@brauner>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 15:29:54 +0200
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>,
David Windsor <dwindsor@...il.com>,
Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com>,
Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Hui Su <sh_def@....com>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nsproxy: Convert nsproxy.count to refcount_t
On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 09:13:32PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> From: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
>
> atomic_t variables are currently used to implement reference counters
> with the following properties:
> - counter is initialized to 1 using atomic_set()
> - a resource is freed upon counter reaching zero
> - once counter reaches zero, its further
> increments aren't allowed
> - counter schema uses basic atomic operations
> (set, inc, inc_not_zero, dec_and_test, etc.)
>
> Such atomic variables should be converted to a newly provided
> refcount_t type and API that prevents accidental counter overflows and
> underflows. This is important since overflows and underflows can lead
> to use-after-free situation and be exploitable.
>
> The variable nsproxy.count is used as pure reference counter. Convert it
> to refcount_t and fix up the operations.
>
> **Important note for maintainers:
>
> Some functions from refcount_t API defined in refcount.h have different
> memory ordering guarantees than their atomic counterparts. Please check
> Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst for more information.
>
> Normally the differences should not matter since refcount_t provides
> enough guarantees to satisfy the refcounting use cases, but in some
> rare cases it might matter. Please double check that you don't have
> some undocumented memory guarantees for this variable usage.
>
> For the nsproxy.count it might make a difference in following places:
> - put_nsproxy() and switch_task_namespaces(): decrement in
> refcount_dec_and_test() only provides RELEASE ordering and ACQUIRE
> ordering on success vs. fully ordered atomic counterpart
>
> Suggested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: David Windsor <dwindsor@...il.com>
> Reviewed-by: Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists