lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <27D91A77-C590-481B-A4AC-C0036CD175C7@oracle.com>
Date:   Fri, 18 Aug 2023 13:29:26 +0000
From:   Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC:     Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the nfsd tree



> On Aug 17, 2023, at 6:54 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> The following commit is also in Linus Torvalds' tree as a different commit
> (but the same patch):
> 
>  7f55e3c57a81 ("sunrpc: set the bv_offset of first bvec in svc_tcp_sendmsg")
> 
> This is commit
> 
>  c96e2a695e00 ("sunrpc: set the bv_offset of first bvec in svc_tcp_sendmsg")
> 
> in Linus' tree.

For the record, I've dropped 7f55e3c57a81 from nfsd-fixes. I'm at a loss
for why the commit hashes differ.


--
Chuck Lever


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ