[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHCN7xJyOjKSXbm17roAJDbk-gDKQHprE9t1d4VH2uYSMZcEDg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2023 16:05:16 -0500
From: Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, aford@...conembedded.com,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ASoC: dt-bindings: fsl_easrc: Add support for imx8mp-easrc
On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 3:33 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 20/08/2023 22:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 20/08/2023 19:56, Adam Ford wrote:
> >> The i.MX8MP appears to have the same easrc support as the Nano, so
> >> add imx8mp as an option with a fallback to imx8mn.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,easrc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,easrc.yaml
> >> index bdde68a1059c..2d53b3b10f2c 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,easrc.yaml
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,easrc.yaml
> >> @@ -14,7 +14,11 @@ properties:
> >> pattern: "^easrc@.*"
> >>
> >> compatible:
> >> - const: fsl,imx8mn-easrc
> >> + oneOf:
> >> + - items:
> >> + - enum:
> >> + - fsl,imx8mp-easrc
> >> + - const: fsl,imx8mn-easrc
> >
> > You need here also const for fsl,imx8mn-easrc, otherwise you do not
> > allow it alone. Test it for fsl,imx8mn-easrc DTS - you will notice warnings.
>
> Actually, I see now Rob's report... you did not have to test DTS even.
> It was enough to test your change and this test was missing :(. Please
> test your changes before sending.
For what it's worth, I did run 'make dt_binding_check', but I didn't
run it with the extra flags from Rob's e-mail. The tool didn't return
any errors.
adam
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists