[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9cd15a97-7479-bb2b-9b47-8702b1e20e52@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 08:18:22 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, aford@...conembedded.com,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ASoC: dt-bindings: fsl_easrc: Add support for
imx8mp-easrc
On 20/08/2023 23:05, Adam Ford wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 3:33 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 20/08/2023 22:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 20/08/2023 19:56, Adam Ford wrote:
>>>> The i.MX8MP appears to have the same easrc support as the Nano, so
>>>> add imx8mp as an option with a fallback to imx8mn.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,easrc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,easrc.yaml
>>>> index bdde68a1059c..2d53b3b10f2c 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,easrc.yaml
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,easrc.yaml
>>>> @@ -14,7 +14,11 @@ properties:
>>>> pattern: "^easrc@.*"
>>>>
>>>> compatible:
>>>> - const: fsl,imx8mn-easrc
>>>> + oneOf:
>>>> + - items:
>>>> + - enum:
>>>> + - fsl,imx8mp-easrc
>>>> + - const: fsl,imx8mn-easrc
>>>
>>> You need here also const for fsl,imx8mn-easrc, otherwise you do not
>>> allow it alone. Test it for fsl,imx8mn-easrc DTS - you will notice warnings.
>>
>> Actually, I see now Rob's report... you did not have to test DTS even.
>> It was enough to test your change and this test was missing :(. Please
>> test your changes before sending.
>
> For what it's worth, I did run 'make dt_binding_check', but I didn't
> run it with the extra flags from Rob's e-mail. The tool didn't return
> any errors.
OK, indeed without the additional flags the example from that binding
won't be reported as undocumented compatible.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists