[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230821114033.4446-1-kkartik@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 17:10:33 +0530
From: Kartik <kkartik@...dia.com>
To: <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
CC: <arnd@...db.de>, <digetx@...il.com>, <frank.li@...o.com>,
<jonathanh@...dia.com>, <kkartik@...dia.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
<pdeschrijver@...dia.com>, <petlozup@...dia.com>,
<pshete@...dia.com>, <robh@...nel.org>, <stefank@...dia.com>,
<sumitg@...dia.com>, <thierry.reding@...il.com>, <windhl@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] soc/tegra: fuse: Add support for Tegra241
On Fri, 2023-08-18 at 18:10 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 03:00:28PM +0530, Kartik wrote:
>> Add support for Tegra241 which use ACPI boot.
>
>...
>
>> case TEGRA234:
>> fuse->soc = &tegra234_fuse_soc;
>> break;
>> +#endif
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_241_SOC)
>> + case TEGRA241:
>> + fuse->soc = &tegra241_fuse_soc;
>> + break;
>> #endif
>
>Have you tried --patience when formatting patches?
>Does it help them to look better?
>
No, I did not use --patience flag while formatting the patches.
Shall I post the next patch set using it?
>...
>
>> +const struct tegra_fuse_soc tegra241_fuse_soc = {
>> + .init = tegra30_fuse_init,
>> + .info = &tegra241_fuse_info,
>
>> + .lookups = NULL,
>> + .num_lookups = 0,
>> + .cells = NULL,
>> + .num_cells = 0,
>
>Isn't it the default?
>
>> + .keepouts = tegra241_fuse_keepouts,
>> + .num_keepouts = ARRAY_SIZE(tegra241_fuse_keepouts),
>> + .soc_attr_group = &tegra194_soc_attr_group,
>
>> + .clk_suspend_on = false,
>
>Ditto.
>
Yes, I will trim this list in the next patch.
>> +};
Regards,
Kartik
Powered by blists - more mailing lists