[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqJbi-780UdoOizx3fMOv+W9WcvNqQt+0fUYwMQAet6BUA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 07:41:11 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Jakob Hauser <jahau@...ketmail.com>,
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the battery tree
On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 2:13 AM Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 21 Aug 2023, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 21 Aug 2023, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > After merging the battery tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> > >
> > > drivers/power/supply/rt5033_charger.c: In function 'rt5033_charger_probe':
> > > drivers/power/supply/rt5033_charger.c:694:19: error: implicit declaration of function 'of_parse_phandle' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >
> > Is this because your merge-conflict patch:
> >
> > linux-next: manual merge of the battery tree with the mfd tree
> >
> > ... removed of_device.h?
>
> Oh, that was Rob's patch. I see now, thanks.
Presumably the functions below got added and failed to add of.h and
instead relied on of_device.h's implicit include of of.h which is
going to get removed. So Stephen's fix is the correct one.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists