linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the battery tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230821124649.GN1380343@google.com>
Date:   Mon, 21 Aug 2023 13:46:49 +0100
From:   Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
        Jakob Hauser <jahau@...ketmail.com>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the battery tree

On Mon, 21 Aug 2023, Rob Herring wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 2:13 AM Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 21 Aug 2023, Lee Jones wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 21 Aug 2023, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > After merging the battery tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > > > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> > > >
> > > > drivers/power/supply/rt5033_charger.c: In function 'rt5033_charger_probe':
> > > > drivers/power/supply/rt5033_charger.c:694:19: error: implicit declaration of function 'of_parse_phandle' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > >
> > > Is this because your merge-conflict patch:
> > >
> > >   linux-next: manual merge of the battery tree with the mfd tree
> > >
> > >  ... removed of_device.h?
> >
> > Oh, that was Rob's patch.  I see now, thanks.
> 
> Presumably the functions below got added and failed to add of.h and
> instead relied on of_device.h's implicit include of of.h which is
> going to get removed. So Stephen's fix is the correct one.

Super.

Stephen, would you mind submitting it in a format we can apply?

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]