[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZONc0r5lJ8C32Kdc@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 15:47:14 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Kartik <kkartik@...dia.com>
Cc: arnd@...db.de, digetx@...il.com, frank.li@...o.com,
jonathanh@...dia.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, pdeschrijver@...dia.com,
petlozup@...dia.com, pshete@...dia.com, robh@...nel.org,
stefank@...dia.com, sumitg@...dia.com, thierry.reding@...il.com,
windhl@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] soc/tegra: fuse: Add support for Tegra241
On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 05:10:33PM +0530, Kartik wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-08-18 at 18:10 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 03:00:28PM +0530, Kartik wrote:
...
> >> case TEGRA234:
> >> fuse->soc = &tegra234_fuse_soc;
> >> break;
> >> +#endif
> >> +#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_241_SOC)
> >> + case TEGRA241:
> >> + fuse->soc = &tegra241_fuse_soc;
> >> + break;
> >> #endif
> >
> >Have you tried --patience when formatting patches?
> >Does it help them to look better?
>
> No, I did not use --patience flag while formatting the patches.
> Shall I post the next patch set using it?
Do you see the difference in the output? If yes, definitely use it.
Otherwise it's recommended to use anyway.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists