lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230822215901.nkikxpcmlrssi42l@treble>
Date:   Tue, 22 Aug 2023 14:59:01 -0700
From:   Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, David.Kaplan@....com,
        Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
        Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@...e.com>,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/22] x86/srso: Fix SBPB enablement for
 spec_rstack_overflow=off

On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 08:07:06AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 07:54:52AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > If you goto pred_cmd, you will overwrite it with PRED_CMD_SBPB here.
> 
> Looking at this more:
> 
> "If SRSO mitigation is not required or is disabled, software may use
> SBPB on context/virtual machine switch to help protect against
> vulnerabilities like Spectre v2."
> 
> I think we actually want this overwrite to happen.

Yeah, I had seen that.  The combination of spectre_v2_user=on with
srso=off doesn't make a whole lot of sense, but... give the user what
they want and all.  Which would presumably be IBPB *without* the SRSO
mitigation (aka SBPB).

> But then if retbleed=ibpb, entry_ibpb() will do bit 0 unconditionally...
> 
> Hmm, lemme talk to people.

I don't think we need to worry about that, SBPB is >= fam19 but retbleed
is <= fam17.  So either way (0x17 or 0x19) entry_ibpb() should do IBPB.

-- 
Josh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ