[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <754de03e-2601-5696-c07c-caef88b974ef@amlogic.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 14:35:56 +0800
From: Yu Tu <yu.tu@...ogic.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
Cc: kelvin.zhang@...ogic.com, qi.duan@...ogic.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V10 1/4] dt-bindings: clock: document Amlogic S4 SoC PLL
clock controller
On 2023/8/23 14:27, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>
> On 23/08/2023 08:20, Yu Tu wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2023/8/23 13:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>
>>> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>>>
>>> On 23/08/2023 04:24, Yu Tu wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2023/8/23 0:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>>>>>> On 22/08/2023 10:27, Yu Tu wrote:
>>>>>> Add the S4 PLL clock controller dt-bindings in the S4 SoC family.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Yu Tu <yu.tu@...ogic.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Lovely. I sent youa friendly reminder at v8 which turns our you
>>>>> ignored. You keep ignoring, I will start ignoring as well from now on.
>>>>
>>>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>>>
>>>> Sorry. I did not forget the friendly reminder in v8, I consulted you for
>>>> this at the time, so I re-sent V9 after adding the tag. Because it was
>>>> just "meson" that was removed. But V10 is based on Neil's patch, which I
>>>> think is a bit of a change. So I didn't dare add it. Instead of
>>>> forgetting your reminder.
>>>>
>>>> So what should I do, I'll follow your advice exactly.
>>>
>>> I don't think there was much difference between the version, which
>>> received the review, and the current patch. Otherwise your changelog
>>> should say that you drop Rb tag. Rebasing of something somewhere is not
>>> the reason, so please describe what are the differences in the patch?
>>
>> The current patch and V9 patch difference is mainly based on Neil patch
>> I put "include/dt - bindings/clock/amlogic,s4-pll-clkc.h" this document
>> describes the clock index all exposed.
>
> Adding one include is insignificant change, thus any Rb tags should stay.
I got it.
>>
>> Next, I should add Rob's tag and resend it. If you have any other
>> suggestions, please tell me and I will strictly follow your suggestions.
>
> I cannot add someone's tag, thus on your next version you must include
> it. I told this last time.
Well. I remember your advice. Guaranteed no errors in the next version.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists