linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/194] 6.1.47-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2023082309-veggie-unwoven-a7df@gregkh>
Date:   Wed, 23 Aug 2023 09:03:49 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/194] 6.1.47-rc1 review

On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 05:49:54PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 09:39:39PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.47 release.
> > There are 194 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 23 Aug 2023 19:40:45 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> 
> Build results:
> 	total: 157 pass: 156 fail: 1
> Failed builds:
> 	m68k:sun3_defconfig
> Qemu test results:
> 	total: 521 pass: 519 fail: 2
> Failed tests:
> 	arm:fuji-bmc:aspeed_g5_defconfig:notests:mem1G:mtd128,0,8,1:net,nic:aspeed-bmc-facebook-fuji:f2fs
> 	arm:bletchley-bmc,fmc-model=mt25qu02g,spi-model=mt25qu02g:aspeed_g5_defconfig:notests:mem1G:mtd256:net,nic:aspeed-bmc-facebook-bletchley:f2fs
> 
> The m68k build failure is
> 
> Inconsistent kallsyms data
> Try make KALLSYMS_EXTRA_PASS=1 as a workaround
> 
> I already have KALLSYMS_EXTRA_PASS=1 enabled, so that doesn't help.
> Nothing to worry about. The f2fs crashes are still seen. They
> also happen for other architectures, so it is not just an arm problem.
> I'll probably just disable all f2fs testing going forward. If so I'll
> send a note clarifying that the lack of reported test failures doesn't
> mean that it works.

I'll look into this later this week, next week to resolve the f2fs
stuff.  I wanted to get to the other known bug fixes first.

> For x86 I get the same runtime warning as everyone else.

Yeah, this is troubling...

Is it clang only?  I'll dig into this today...

thanks,

greg k-h