linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] iio: adc: ltc2309: switch to new .probe()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 24 Aug 2023 20:01:01 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Liam Beguin <liambeguin@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] iio: adc: ltc2309: switch to new .probe()

On 24/08/2023 18:55, Liam Beguin wrote:
> Recent changes to the I2C subsystem removed the id parameter of the
> probe function. Update driver to use the new prototype, and keep this as
> an independent commit to facilitate backporting.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Liam Beguin <liambeguin@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iio/adc/ltc2309.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ltc2309.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ltc2309.c
> index ee1fd9b82e2a..d26bbd70b0ff 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ltc2309.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ltc2309.c
> @@ -158,8 +158,7 @@ static const struct iio_info ltc2309_info = {
>  	.read_raw = ltc2309_read_raw,
>  };
>  
> -static int ltc2309_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> -			 const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> +static int ltc2309_probe(struct i2c_client *client)

This patch does not make sense. Do not send patch (1/3) which does not
compile and is buggy, just to immediately fix it. We do not add known
wrong code.

Best regards,
Krzysztof