[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2023082420-quaking-barley-47b4@gregkh>
Date:   Thu, 24 Aug 2023 13:40:35 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Martin Zaťovič <m.zatovic1@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
        linus.walleij@...aro.org, quic_jhugo@...cinc.com,
        nipun.gupta@....com, tzimmermann@...e.de, ogabbay@...nel.org,
        mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, axboe@...nel.dk,
        damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com, linux@...y.sk, arnd@...db.de,
        yangyicong@...ilicon.com, benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com,
        masahiroy@...nel.org, jacek.lawrynowicz@...ux.intel.com,
        geert+renesas@...der.be, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        andriy.shevchenko@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 2/4] wiegand: add Wiegand bus driver
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 01:10:13PM +0200, Martin Zaťovič wrote:
> +static inline void wiegand_controller_put(void *ptr)
Why is this a void *?  It should be "struct wiegand_controller *"
Please never use void * if at all possible.
> +static inline void wiegand_unregister_driver(struct wiegand_driver *wdrv)
> +{
> +	if (wdrv)
How could this ever be true?
> +		driver_unregister(&wdrv->driver);
> +}
> +
> +static inline struct wiegand_driver *to_wiegand_driver(struct device_driver *drv)
> +{
> +	return drv ? container_of(drv, struct wiegand_driver, driver) : NULL;
How could drv be NULL?
And you should make this a const *, right?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
