lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230825170001.GB22659@quicinc.com>
Date:   Fri, 25 Aug 2023 10:00:01 -0700
From:   Guru Das Srinagesh <quic_gurus@...cinc.com>
To:     Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>
CC:     Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Kees Cook" <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        <quic_pkondeti@...cinc.com>, <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Guru Das Srinagesh <quic_gurus@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] scripts: Add add-maintainer.py

On Aug 25 2023 13:44, Nicolas Schier wrote:
> On Thu 24 Aug 2023 14:44:36 GMT, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:
> > > While testing, I thought that adding addresses without filtering-out duplicates
> > > was odd; but as git-send-email does the unique filtering, it doesn't matter.
> > 
> > Since I'm using `set()` in this script, the uniqueness is guaranteed here as
> > well - there won't be any duplicates.
> 
> I thought about patch files that already have 'To/Cc' headers (e.g.  
> 'git format-patch --to=... --cc=...' or by running add-maintainer.py 
> multiple times for updating the lists of recipients.  The result is a 
> patch file with possible duplicated lines; but as written: it does 
> matter, effectively.

Sorry, did you mean "does" or "does *not*"?

I'll make sure to test v3 of this script out on patches that have To/Cc already
included and also run it multiple times on the same patch (effectively the same
thing).

Thank you.

Guru Das.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ