[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230825135226.ikxvskplvppghwtz@box.shutemov.name>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 16:52:26 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>,
Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/tdx: Mark TSC reliable
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 05:49:05PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 08 2023 at 23:01, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 10:13:05AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> >> I take it this is carved in stone in the TDX specs somewhere. A
> >> reference would be nice.
> >
> > TDX Module 1.0 spec:
> >
> > 5.3.5. Time Stamp Counter (TSC)
> >
> > TDX provides a trusted virtual TSC to the guest TDs. TSC value is
> > monotonously incrementing, starting from 0 on TD initialization by the
> > host VMM. The deviation between virtual TSC values read by each VCPU is
> > small.
>
> Nice weasel wording. What's the definition of "small"?
The newer spec says "Virtual TSC values are consistent among all the TD’s
VCPUs at the level supported by the CPU".
--
Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists