[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <154203eb-dcdb-4152-aec0-cfcc1bf80c13@linaro.org>
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2023 13:53:13 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>,
Alexey Minnekhanov <alexeymin@...tmarketos.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm630: remove refs to nonexistent
clocks
On 19.07.2023 11:46, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 11:36:46AM +0300, Alexey Minnekhanov wrote:
>> On 19.07.2023 10:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> It does not look like you tested the DTS against bindings. Please run
>>> `make dtbs_check`
>>>
>>
>> If DT schema for interconnect requires bus clocks to be specified, I don't
>> even know what to put there now. Can we change schema?
>>
>
> I think I mentioned the DT schema updates during the review of Konrad's
> interconnect changes and he mentioned he would like to clean those up
> after getting the series in. (Which would be sometime soon now I guess)
>
> For now, having the &rpmcc "bus"/"bus_a"/"ipa" clocks specified on the
> interconnect@... nodes is still valid. At runtime they will just be
> ignored. Feel free to just keep them there for this initial fix.
>
> For the other two usages (iommu@, usb@) these votes with minimal
> frequency look a bit related to the "keep_alive" stuff Konrad added. [1]
> Maybe that could be used here instead of bypassing interconnect with the
> clock votes?
or just pass interconnects=
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists