lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <154203eb-dcdb-4152-aec0-cfcc1bf80c13@linaro.org>
Date:   Sat, 26 Aug 2023 13:53:13 +0200
From:   Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To:     Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>,
        Alexey Minnekhanov <alexeymin@...tmarketos.org>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm630: remove refs to nonexistent
 clocks

On 19.07.2023 11:46, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 11:36:46AM +0300, Alexey Minnekhanov wrote:
>> On 19.07.2023 10:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> It does not look like you tested the DTS against bindings. Please run
>>> `make dtbs_check`
>>>
>>
>> If DT schema for interconnect requires bus clocks to be specified, I don't
>> even know what to put there now. Can we change schema?
>>
> 
> I think I mentioned the DT schema updates during the review of Konrad's
> interconnect changes and he mentioned he would like to clean those up
> after getting the series in. (Which would be sometime soon now I guess)
> 
> For now, having the &rpmcc "bus"/"bus_a"/"ipa" clocks specified on the
> interconnect@... nodes is still valid. At runtime they will just be
> ignored. Feel free to just keep them there for this initial fix.
> 
> For the other two usages (iommu@, usb@) these votes with minimal
> frequency look a bit related to the "keep_alive" stuff Konrad added. [1]
> Maybe that could be used here instead of bypassing interconnect with the
> clock votes?
or just pass interconnects=

Konrad

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ