[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZLexD5tdjYGhTCR9@gerhold.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 11:46:55 +0200
From: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>
To: Alexey Minnekhanov <alexeymin@...tmarketos.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm630: remove refs to nonexistent
clocks
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 11:36:46AM +0300, Alexey Minnekhanov wrote:
> On 19.07.2023 10:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > It does not look like you tested the DTS against bindings. Please run
> > `make dtbs_check`
> >
>
> If DT schema for interconnect requires bus clocks to be specified, I don't
> even know what to put there now. Can we change schema?
>
I think I mentioned the DT schema updates during the review of Konrad's
interconnect changes and he mentioned he would like to clean those up
after getting the series in. (Which would be sometime soon now I guess)
For now, having the &rpmcc "bus"/"bus_a"/"ipa" clocks specified on the
interconnect@... nodes is still valid. At runtime they will just be
ignored. Feel free to just keep them there for this initial fix.
For the other two usages (iommu@, usb@) these votes with minimal
frequency look a bit related to the "keep_alive" stuff Konrad added. [1]
Maybe that could be used here instead of bypassing interconnect with the
clock votes?
Thanks,
Stephan
[1]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=b979049c38e170286158e97290c892957c836903
Powered by blists - more mailing lists