[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e2741c4a-983f-4039-b25f-6d3bad1c6cee@linaro.org>
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2023 14:13:57 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>, rfoss@...nel.org,
todor.too@...il.com, agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org,
mchehab@...nel.org, hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl,
laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com,
andrey.konovalov@...aro.org
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/15] media: qcom: camss: Capture VFE CSID dependency
in a helper function
On 26.08.2023 14:12, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 26/08/2023 13:04, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>>> From sdm845 onwards we need to ensure the VFE is powered on prior to
>>>>> switching on the CSID.
>>>> And what's the symptom if we fail to ensure this? How can someone
>>>> adding support for another platform tell whether the match-list
>>>> should be expanded?
>>> That person has to understand the dependency.
>> If we need this workaround, there surely must be something that doesn't
>> work without it, a measurable symptom. What is it?
>
> The CSID lives inside of the VFE therefore the VFE must be power prior to the CSID.
>
> The symptom will be .. the CSID doesn't come out of reset.
Good, that's what I needed to know.
Now we can rename that function to something like camss_csid_inside_vfe()
to make it more meaningful
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists