linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] kconfig: introduce listunknownconfig

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK7LNARMOpzpr6E6XG-ro5dUgFWMP9r5rqET1WquOvvsckbKyA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 26 Aug 2023 14:38:20 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
To:     Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
Cc:     Ying Sun <sunying@...iscas.ac.cn>,
        Jesse T <mr.bossman075@...il.com>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] kconfig: introduce listunknownconfig

On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 10:12 AM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 7:50 PM Sergey Senozhatsky
> <senozhatsky@...omium.org> wrote:
> >
> > On (23/08/24 10:00), Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >
> > > For the MFD_RK808 case particularly,
> > > I believe Kconfig showed MFD_RK8XX_I2C
> > > as a new option.
> >
> > I think there were some other unmet dependencies for MFD_RK8XX_I2C and
> > I don't think the new config was shown. But even if it was, we still
> > would have no idea that this meant "MFD_RK808 is not available anymore
> > and the corresponding code won't get compiled". So the "this is not
> > recognized anymore" is still needed and is quite helpful.
> >
> > Would you be OK with "list missing" being a warning (not a terminal
> > condition)?
>
>
> I am fine with implementing both.
>
> But, I'd like to implement them as separate options.
> (one option for warn unknown symbols,
> another for for turning warnings into errors)
>
>
>
> As I replied to Tomasz, I am considering about
> env variables vs command line options associated with W= option.



With a little more thought, the command line option approach
would require more code changes and efforts.


So, I am OK with adding new env variables.
Could you add two env variables?


I think

the first two hunks (show warnings for symbols not found in Kconfig)
        -> KCONFIG_WARN_UNKNOWN_SYMBOLS

the last hunk (turn warnings into errors)
        -> KCONFIG_WERROR


(You can suggest a better naming if you have, but I guess
KCONFIG_WARN_*  will be consistent in case
more warning requests come up.)





--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada