[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <PAXPR04MB9185526385C775306A87D85989E0A@PAXPR04MB9185.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 19:49:49 +0000
From: Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@....com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
"imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: power: Add regulator-pd yaml file
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> Sent: Monday, August 28, 2023 2:31 PM
> To: Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@....com>; Ulf Hansson
> <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>; Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>; Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>;
> Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>; Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>;
> imx@...ts.linux.dev; devicetree@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
> Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: power: Add regulator-pd yaml
> > The fixed-regulator is a virtual regulator driver that uses the GPIO pin.
>
> We do not talk about drivers but bindings and DTS. Why do you bring again
> drivers, all the time?
>
> > You claimed this
> > as a hardware chip.
>
> ??? Sorry, this is getting boring. The DTS-snippet is a hardware chip.
> If it is not, then drop it from your DTS. I insist. Srsly, third time I insist.
>
>
> >
> > The regulator-pd driver also uses the same GPIO pin.
>
> Again, what is with the drivers? Can you stop bringing it to the discussion?
>
I have to admit you have a real talent for debate.
Thanks,
Shenwei
> > You now claimed this as a software layer.
>
> ???
>
> >
> > What's your standard?
>
> I don't think there is anything more to say. You clearly do not understand what is
> DTS, schematics and how the actual hardware looks like.
>
> I am not going to respond more to this patchset (which is a clear NAK just in
> case).
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists