[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230828065625.ufp66goznd72rcyh@vireshk-i7>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 12:26:25 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Liao Chang <liaochang1@...wei.com>
Cc: rafael@...nel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: governor: Free dbs_data directly when
gov->init() fails
On 26-08-23, 01:24, Liao Chang wrote:
> Due to the kobject embedded in the dbs_data doest not has a release()
> method yet, it needs to use kfree() to free dbs_data directly when
> governor fails to allocate the tunner field of dbs_data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liao Chang <liaochang1@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> index 85da677c43d6..6e1ac864e87e 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> @@ -438,8 +438,10 @@ int cpufreq_dbs_governor_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> gov_attr_set_init(&dbs_data->attr_set, &policy_dbs->list);
>
> ret = gov->init(dbs_data);
> - if (ret)
> + if (ret) {
> + kfree(dbs_data);
> goto free_policy_dbs_info;
> + }
What about this instead ?
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
index 85da677c43d6..af44ee6a6430 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
@@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ int cpufreq_dbs_governor_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
ret = gov->init(dbs_data);
if (ret)
- goto free_policy_dbs_info;
+ goto free_dbs_data;
/*
* The sampling interval should not be less than the transition latency
@@ -474,6 +474,8 @@ int cpufreq_dbs_governor_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
if (!have_governor_per_policy())
gov->gdbs_data = NULL;
gov->exit(dbs_data);
+
+free_dbs_data:
kfree(dbs_data);
free_policy_dbs_info:
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists