| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 09:44:00 +0000
From: "Havalige, Thippeswamy" <thippeswamy.havalige@....com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"lpieralisi@...nel.org" <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
"robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>, "kw@...ux.com" <kw@...ux.com>,
"Simek, Michal" <michal.simek@....com>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org"
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"Gogada, Bharat Kumar" <bharat.kumar.gogada@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 3/3] PCI: xilinx-xdma: Add Xilinx XDMA Root Port driver
Hi Bjorn,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Havalige, Thippeswamy
> Sent: Monday, August 28, 2023 2:39 PM
> To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> pci@...r.kernel.org; devicetree@...r.kernel.org; bhelgaas@...gle.com;
> lpieralisi@...nel.org; robh@...nel.org; kw@...ux.com; Simek, Michal
> <michal.simek@....com>; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org; Gogada,
> Bharat Kumar <bharat.kumar.gogada@....com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 3/3] PCI: xilinx-xdma: Add Xilinx XDMA Root Port driver
>
> Hi Bjorn,
>
> Thanks, ll take all your comments and update them in next patch.
>
> Regards,
> Thippeswamy H
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2023 1:44 AM
> > To: Havalige, Thippeswamy <thippeswamy.havalige@....com>
> > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org;
> > linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux- pci@...r.kernel.org;
> > devicetree@...r.kernel.org; bhelgaas@...gle.com;
> > lpieralisi@...nel.org; robh@...nel.org; kw@...ux.com; Simek, Michal
> > <michal.simek@....com>; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org; Gogada,
> > Bharat Kumar <bharat.kumar.gogada@....com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] PCI: xilinx-xdma: Add Xilinx XDMA Root
> > Port driver
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 03:05:07PM +0530, Thippeswamy Havalige wrote:
> > > Add support for Xilinx XDMA Soft IP core as Root Port.
> > >
> > > The Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoCs devices support XDMA soft IP module in
> > > programmable logic.
> > >
> > > The integrated XDMA soft IP block has integrated bridge function
> > > that can act as PCIe Root Port.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Thippeswamy Havalige <thippeswamy.havalige@....com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharat.kumar.gogada@....com>
> > > ---
> > > changes in v6:
> > > - Replaced chained irq's with regular interrupts.
> >
> > Thanks a million for working this out!
> >
> > Trivial comments below, wait a couple days before reposting in case
> > there are other comments.
> >
> > > +static inline bool xilinx_pl_dma_pcie_link_up(struct pl_dma_pcie
> > > +*port) {
> > > + return (pcie_read(port, XILINX_PCIE_DMA_REG_PSCR) &
> > > + XILINX_PCIE_DMA_REG_PSCR_LNKUP) ? 1 : 0;
> >
> > This function returns bool, so I think true/false would be more
> > appropriate than 1/0.
> >
> > > +static bool xilinx_pl_dma_pcie_valid_device(struct pci_bus *bus,
> > > + unsigned int devfn)
> > > +{
> > > + struct pl_dma_pcie *port = bus->sysdata;
> > > +
> > > + /* Check if link is up when trying to access downstream ports */
> > > + if (!pci_is_root_bus(bus)) {
> > > + /*
> > > + * Checking whether link is up here is a last line of defence,
> > > + * if the link goes down after we check for link-up, we have a
> > > + * problem: if a PIO request is initiated while link-down, the
> > > + * whole controller hangs, and even after link comes up again,
> > > + * previous PIO requests won't work, and a reset of the whole
> > > + * PCIe controller is needed. Henceforth we need link-up
> > check
> > > + * here to avoid sending PIO request when link is down. This
> > > + * check is racy by definition and does not make controller
> > hang
> > > + * if the link goes down after this check is performed.
> >
> > This comment doesn't make sense to me. "If PIO request initiated
> > while link- down, controller hangs ... This check is racy and does not
> > make controller hang if link goes down." Which is it?
In link down scenario, will treat current device as a invalid device.
> > My *guess* is that this check narrows the window but doesn't close it,
> > so if
> > xilinx_pl_dma_pcie_link_up() finds the link up, but the link goes down
> > before
> > pci_generic_config_read() initiates the PIO request, the controller
> > hangs, and a reset is required.
> >
> > > + */
> > > + if (!xilinx_pl_dma_pcie_link_up(port))
> > > + return false;
> > > + } else if (devfn > 0)
> > > + /* Only one device down on each root port */
> > > + return false;
> > > +
> > > + return true;
> > > +}
> >
> > > +/* INTx error interrupts are Xilinx controller specific interrupt,
> > > +used to
> > > + * notify user about error's such as cfg timeout, slave unsupported
> > > +requests,
> >
> > s/error's/errors/
> >
> > > + * fatal and non fatal error etc.
> >
> > > + err = devm_request_irq(dev, irq,
> > xilinx_pl_dma_pcie_intr_handler,
> > > + IRQF_SHARED | IRQF_NO_THREAD,
> > intr_cause[i].sym, port);
> >
> > Rewrap to fit in 80 columns.
> >
> > > + /* Needed for MSI DECODE MODE */
> > > + pcie_write(port, XILINX_PCIE_DMA_IDR_ALL_MASK,
> > XILINX_PCIE_DMA_REG_MSI_LOW_MASK);
> > > + pcie_write(port, XILINX_PCIE_DMA_IDR_ALL_MASK,
> > > +XILINX_PCIE_DMA_REG_MSI_HI_MASK);
> >
> > Rewrap.
> >
> > Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists