[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <81ccf8f3d7294cffab754901df83b401@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 14:25:22 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Al Viro' <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] vfs: use helpers for calling f_op->{read,write}_iter() in
read_write.c
From: Al Viro
> Sent: 28 August 2023 15:10
>
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 02:30:42PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 05:00:36AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 11:50:56PM +0800, Kemeng Shi wrote:
> > > > use helpers for calling f_op->{read,write}_iter() in read_write.c
> > > >
> > >
> > > Why? We really should just remove the completely pointless wrappers
> > > instead.
> >
> > Especially because it means you chase this helper to figure out what's
> > actually going on. If there was more to it then it would make sense but
> > not just as a pointless wrapper.
>
> It's borderline easier to grep for, but not dramatically so. call_mmap()
> has a stronger argument in favour - there are several methods called
> ->mmap and telling one from another is hard without looking into context.
Which might be a justification for renaming some/all of the ->mmap()
do make them easier to find.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists