linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] misc: bm92txx: Add driver for the ROHM BM92Txx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3f26449e-4208-f1a2-dd3c-3ecc095f4ea0@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 28 Aug 2023 19:08:09 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Emmanuel Gil Peyrot <linkmauve@...kmauve.fr>
Cc:     azkali <a.ffcc7@...il.com>, Adam Jiang <chaoj@...dia.com>,
        CTCaer <ctcaer@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Derek Kiernan <derek.kiernan@....com>,
        Dragan Cvetic <dragan.cvetic@....com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] misc: bm92txx: Add driver for the ROHM BM92Txx

On 28/08/2023 19:05, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 28/08/2023 17:06, Emmanuel Gil Peyrot wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 06:28:07PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 24/08/2023 17:30, Emmanuel Gil Peyrot wrote:
>>>> From: azkali <a.ffcc7@...il.com>
>>>>
>>>> This is used as the USB-C Power Delivery controller of the Nintendo
>>>> Switch.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Gil Peyrot <linkmauve@...kmauve.fr>
>>>> Signed-off-by: azkali <a.ffcc7@...il.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Adam Jiang <chaoj@...dia.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: CTCaer <ctcaer@...il.com>
>>>
>>> These do not look like real identities. In this and previous patchset
>>> your author emails bounces, so I propose to drop all stale addresses and
>>> all anonymous entries.
>>
>> I and the authors find that policy inacceptable, our work should be
>> credited and our copyright should hold despite our choice of name.
> 
> Which authors? The ones who do not want to give real, working email? Or
> the ones who do not want to provide known identity, which is required by
> our submission process?
> 

BTW, you mistake copyrights with DCO... DCO does not automatically give
any of the intermediate people copyrights.

Best regards,
Krzysztof