linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] misc: bm92txx: Add driver for the ROHM BM92Txx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <faf53a03-341c-994e-e66f-46cf88aeaa8e@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 28 Aug 2023 19:05:44 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Emmanuel Gil Peyrot <linkmauve@...kmauve.fr>
Cc:     azkali <a.ffcc7@...il.com>, Adam Jiang <chaoj@...dia.com>,
        CTCaer <ctcaer@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Derek Kiernan <derek.kiernan@....com>,
        Dragan Cvetic <dragan.cvetic@....com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] misc: bm92txx: Add driver for the ROHM BM92Txx

On 28/08/2023 17:06, Emmanuel Gil Peyrot wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 06:28:07PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 24/08/2023 17:30, Emmanuel Gil Peyrot wrote:
>>> From: azkali <a.ffcc7@...il.com>
>>>
>>> This is used as the USB-C Power Delivery controller of the Nintendo
>>> Switch.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Gil Peyrot <linkmauve@...kmauve.fr>
>>> Signed-off-by: azkali <a.ffcc7@...il.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Adam Jiang <chaoj@...dia.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: CTCaer <ctcaer@...il.com>
>>
>> These do not look like real identities. In this and previous patchset
>> your author emails bounces, so I propose to drop all stale addresses and
>> all anonymous entries.
> 
> I and the authors find that policy inacceptable, our work should be
> credited and our copyright should hold despite our choice of name.

Which authors? The ones who do not want to give real, working email? Or
the ones who do not want to provide known identity, which is required by
our submission process?


Best regards,
Krzysztof