linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v8] selftests/bpf: trace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <tencent_F746AF27A3E588BF061F427F59F9979A2A08@qq.com>
Date:   Tue, 29 Aug 2023 08:47:35 +0800
From:   Rong Tao <rtoax@...mail.com>
To:     olsajiri@...il.com
Cc:     alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, andrii@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, chantr4@...il.com, daniel@...earbox.net,
        deso@...teo.net, eddyz87@...il.com, haoluo@...gle.com,
        iii@...ux.ibm.com, john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
        laoar.shao@...il.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, martin.lau@...ux.dev,
        mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com, mykolal@...com, rongtao@...tc.cn,
        rtoax@...mail.com, sdf@...gle.com, shuah@...nel.org,
        song@...nel.org, xukuohai@...wei.com, yonghong.song@...ux.dev,
        zwisler@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v8] selftests/bpf: trace_helpers.c: optimize kallsyms cache

> > Hi, jirka. Thanks for your reply.
> > 
> > > > @@ -164,13 +165,14 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> > > >  	}
> > > >  
> > > >  	/* initialize kernel symbol translation */
> > > > -	if (load_kallsyms()) {
> > > > +	ksyms = load_kallsyms();
> > > 
> > > if we keep the load_kallsyms/ksym_search/ksym_get_addr functions as described
> > > in [1] the samples/bpf would stay untouched apart from the Makefile change
> > 
> > Maybe we should make this modification, wouldn't it be better? After all,
> > not modifying the source code of samples/bpf is not really a reason not to
> > make modifications to load_kallsyms(), what do you think?
> 
> I think we want separate selftest and samples changes and I don't see
> other way to do that

Thanks, jirka, I didn't notice this in the previous discussion, sorry.
Let me try to solve this problem.

Rong Tao