[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wi5Lh-NG_rvcx3Zyqd2Uhj76G4V73tWCFULhVzOU6e1xg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 18:19:56 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
soc@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: SoC/genpd driver updates for v6.6
On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 at 17:48, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> How about moving it to drivers/power/domain/ instead?
That sounds like a sensible name and would seem to fit logically with
our existing tree structure quite well.
> I don't think we can easily rename the interfaces that have been
> in use for the past 12 years
I actually think the interface names are much less of an issue, since
anybody using them is presumably familiar with the naming.
It was only with the directory structure that I reacted to it, because
that kind of exposes the naming to people who definitely are *not*
familiar with it (ie me, but presumably anybody else who sees the
diffstats etc fly past).
And yes, we have a number of other pretty obscure driver names in our
tree (I end up having to remind myself what "ntb" and "hsi" etc mean),
and I don't tend to love them either, but at least they tend to be
industry / vendor names.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists