[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230830092314.624212-1-mathieu.moneyron@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 11:23:14 +0200
From: mathieu <mathieu.moneyron@...il.com>
To: ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
ulf.hansson@...aro.org, nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com,
alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com
Cc: Mathieu Moneyron <mathieu.moneyron@...il.com>,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] mmc: Fix force card detect in sdhci
From: Mathieu Moneyron <mathieu.moneyron@...il.com>
On the ATMEL at91 when using the non-removable flag in device tree and not
using the card-detect pin inside the device-tree pinctrl, the card detect
pin is physically still used which can cause unknown behaviour when this
pin is used for other purposes.
>From my interpretation this seems to be caused by a hardware design flaw
and the real hardware is not working as intended by the documentation.
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Moneyron <mathieu.moneyron@...il.com>
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-at91.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-at91.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-at91.c
index 69fef88e7..4fd6bfbf6 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-at91.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-at91.c
@@ -51,10 +51,15 @@ struct sdhci_at91_priv {
static void sdhci_at91_set_force_card_detect(struct sdhci_host *host)
{
u8 mc1r;
+ u8 ctrl;
mc1r = readb(host->ioaddr + SDMMC_MC1R);
mc1r |= SDMMC_MC1R_FCD;
writeb(mc1r, host->ioaddr + SDMMC_MC1R);
+
+ ctrl = readb(host->ioaddr + SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL);
+ ctrl |= SDHCI_CTRL_CDTEST_INS | SDHCI_CTRL_CDTEST_EN;
+ writeb(ctrl, host->ioaddr + SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL);
}
static void sdhci_at91_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned int clock)
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists