[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZPBn7CJ9ppIheCT4@FVFF77S0Q05N>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 11:14:04 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@...il.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer.chen@...iatek.com>,
Tomohiro Misono <misono.tomohiro@...itsu.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>, ito-yuichi@...itsu.com,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
D Scott Phillips <scott@...amperecomputing.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 6/7] arm64: kgdb: Implement kgdb_roundup_cpus() to
enable pseudo-NMI roundup
On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 12:11:27PM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> Up until now we've been using the generic (weak) implementation for
> kgdb_roundup_cpus() when using kgdb on arm64. Let's move to a custom
> one. The advantage here is that, when pseudo-NMI is enabled on a
> device, we'll be able to round up CPUs using pseudo-NMI. This allows
> us to debug CPUs that are stuck with interrupts disabled. If
> pseudo-NMIs are not enabled then we'll fallback to just using an IPI,
> which is still slightly better than the generic implementation since
> it avoids the potential situation described in the generic
> kgdb_call_nmi_hook().
>
> Co-developed-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> ---
> I debated whether this should be in "arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c" or if I
> should try to find a way for it to go into "arch/arm64/kernel/kgdb.c".
> In the end this is so little code that it didn't seem worth it to find
> a way to export the IPI defines or to otherwise come up with some API
> between kgdb.c and smp.c. If someone has strong feelings and wants
> this to change, please shout and give details of your preferred
> solution.
Putting this in smp.c seems fine to me.
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Mark.
>
> FWIW, it seems like ~half the other platforms put this in "smp.c" with
> an ifdef for KGDB and the other half put it in "kgdb.c" with an ifdef
> for SMP. :-P
>
> (no changes since v10)
>
> Changes in v10:
> - Don't allocate the cpumask on the stack; just iterate.
> - Moved kgdb calls to smp.c to avoid needing to export IPI info.
> - kgdb now has its own IPI.
>
> Changes in v9:
> - Remove fallback for when debug IPI isn't available.
> - Renamed "NMI IPI" to "debug IPI" since it might not be backed by NMI.
>
> arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> index 800c59cf9b64..1a53e57c81d0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
> #include <linux/irq_work.h>
> #include <linux/kernel_stat.h>
> #include <linux/kexec.h>
> +#include <linux/kgdb.h>
> #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> #include <linux/nmi.h>
>
> @@ -79,6 +80,7 @@ enum ipi_msg_type {
> * with trace_ipi_*
> */
> IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE = NR_IPI,
> + IPI_KGDB_ROUNDUP,
> MAX_IPI
> };
>
> @@ -868,6 +870,22 @@ void arch_trigger_cpumask_backtrace(const cpumask_t *mask, int exclude_cpu)
> nmi_trigger_cpumask_backtrace(mask, exclude_cpu, arm64_backtrace_ipi);
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KGDB
> +void kgdb_roundup_cpus(void)
> +{
> + int this_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
> + int cpu;
> +
> + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> + /* No need to roundup ourselves */
> + if (cpu == this_cpu)
> + continue;
> +
> + __ipi_send_single(ipi_desc[IPI_KGDB_ROUNDUP], cpu);
> + }
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> /*
> * Main handler for inter-processor interrupts
> */
> @@ -919,6 +937,10 @@ static void do_handle_IPI(int ipinr)
> nmi_cpu_backtrace(get_irq_regs());
> break;
>
> + case IPI_KGDB_ROUNDUP:
> + kgdb_nmicallback(cpu, get_irq_regs());
> + break;
> +
> default:
> pr_crit("CPU%u: Unknown IPI message 0x%x\n", cpu, ipinr);
> break;
> @@ -949,6 +971,7 @@ static bool ipi_should_be_nmi(enum ipi_msg_type ipi)
> case IPI_CPU_STOP:
> case IPI_CPU_CRASH_STOP:
> case IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE:
> + case IPI_KGDB_ROUNDUP:
> return true;
> default:
> return false;
> --
> 2.42.0.283.g2d96d420d3-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists