[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZPBoMx8fsFRnC8gI@FVFF77S0Q05N>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 11:15:15 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@...il.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer.chen@...iatek.com>,
Tomohiro Misono <misono.tomohiro@...itsu.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>, ito-yuichi@...itsu.com,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
D Scott Phillips <scott@...amperecomputing.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 7/7] arm64: smp: Mark IPI globals as __ro_after_init
On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 12:11:28PM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> Mark the three IPI-related globals in smp.c as "__ro_after_init" since
> they are only ever set in set_smp_ipi_range(), which is marked
> "__init". This is a better and more secure marking than the old
> "__read_mostly".
>
> Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> ---
> This patch is almost completely unrelated to the rest of the series
> other than the fact that it would cause a merge conflict with the
> series if sent separately. I tacked it on to this series in response
> to Stephen's feedback on v11 of this series [1]. If someone hates it
> (not sure why they would), it could be dropped. If someone loves it,
> it could be promoted to the start of the series and/or land on its own
> (resolving merge conflicts).
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAE-0n52iVDgZa8XT8KTMj12c_ESSJt7f7A0fuZ_oAMMqpGcSzA@mail.gmail.com
This looks reasonable to me, so:
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Mark.
>
> Changes in v12:
> - ("arm64: smp: Mark IPI globals as __ro_after_init") new for v12.
>
> arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> index 1a53e57c81d0..814d9aa93b21 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -84,9 +84,9 @@ enum ipi_msg_type {
> MAX_IPI
> };
>
> -static int ipi_irq_base __read_mostly;
> -static int nr_ipi __read_mostly = NR_IPI;
> -static struct irq_desc *ipi_desc[MAX_IPI] __read_mostly;
> +static int ipi_irq_base __ro_after_init;
> +static int nr_ipi __ro_after_init = NR_IPI;
> +static struct irq_desc *ipi_desc[MAX_IPI] __ro_after_init;
>
> static void ipi_setup(int cpu);
>
> --
> 2.42.0.283.g2d96d420d3-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists