[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230901131217.139c0cce@endymion.delvare>
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2023 13:12:17 +0200
From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
To: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/14] I2C: nforce2: Do PCI error check on own line
On Thu, 24 Aug 2023 16:28:26 +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> Instead of a if condition with a line split, use the usual error
> handling pattern with a separate variable to improve readability.
>
> No functional changes intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nforce2.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nforce2.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nforce2.c
> index 777278386f58..38d203d93eee 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nforce2.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nforce2.c
> @@ -327,8 +327,8 @@ static int nforce2_probe_smb(struct pci_dev *dev, int bar, int alt_reg,
> /* Older incarnations of the device used non-standard BARs */
> u16 iobase;
>
> - if (pci_read_config_word(dev, alt_reg, &iobase)
> - != PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL) {
> + error = pci_read_config_word(dev, alt_reg, &iobase);
> + if (error != PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL) {
> dev_err(&dev->dev, "Error reading PCI config for %s\n",
> name);
> return -EIO;
Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
Thanks,
--
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
Powered by blists - more mailing lists